silverflight8: Barcode with silverflight8 on top and userid underneath (_support)
If book reviews could just be my off-the-cuff analysis and flailing about books and characters and such, it'd take me less than half an hour to do them, instead of (some of them) months because I procrastinate. Writing plot summaries is the bane of my reviewing life, because it's boring and also the author did it much better than me: that'd be the novel. And you have to try to limit spoilers or else it's not useful to people who haven't read the books.

The best part about reviewing is where you can just dissect the novels. If I want to take issue with your dinosaurs on spaceships (side note: if anyone has read a novel with this premise, tell me now please) then I totally can, or I can run about yelling it's the very best part of the book, everyone on my flist, you should go find this book! Or--and this is my favourite part of the speculative fiction umbrella--it's the speculation on what parts are taken from Earth and what's not. (Even secondary world fantasy invariably borrows from earthly institutions, beliefs, political structure, biology, climate.) For some reason this is so satisfying. And also I can talk about characterization or plot twists or just the writing flat out (like C.S. Lewis', because it was simply, remarkably beautiful), anything I think is relevant.

This has been brought to you by the fact I finished Megan Whalen Turner's The Thief. Review forthcoming.
silverflight8: bee on rose  (Nanowrimo 2010)
It's just sunny enough outside that today during my lunch hour, I went outside and finished reading Among Others (Jo Walton). It's supposed to snow at some point I think, but at one o'clock it was just like the beginning of spring - snow in the shadows of the building but lots of warmth in the sun. Still wearing my winter coat though.

Among Others, that was excellent. Oh my god. I've explained and recced it to three people today and I still can't come up with a suitable summary. Review forthcoming, after I post the Crimson Crown one (it was also excellent, but in a different way.) I'd be off to find allllll of Jo Walton's books, but I actually have a pile of sf/f on my floor right now, including the complete Lyonesse, so I have to get to those first.

But yes! If you see it on the bookshelf, grab it and see if you like it! Unqualified rec.

God, I've missed reading books. I've read so much novel-length fic, but it's not the same as a totally self-sustaining secondary fantasy. Even one with ties to the real world.

Round-up.

Jul. 9th, 2012 10:30 pm
silverflight8: Barcode with silverflight8 on top and userid underneath (_support)
These days I post rarely because my life is probably quite dull. And when I talk about books, all that comes out is KUSHIEL'S TRILOGY, oh, madness, I have many private entries which are mostly reaction posts. Frankly, it's rather embarrassing. And even more dangerously, I am actually considering fic, and wondering if my AO3 account is divorced enough from RL (going from RL to fandom, that is, not the other way round). I know what's going on Yuletide though. Naamah's trilogy characters, Collegia Magica.

But I have reviews! These are badly, badly backlogged, but I've gotten through some (they were all DOOO'd). Title, author, shortest summary I can think of, links to same thing on lj/dw.
Ascendant, by Diana Peterfreund, killer unicorns: LJ | DW
The Graveyard Book, by Neil Gaiman, boy lives in graveyard: LJ | DW
Uther, by Jack Whyte, Uther's life: LJ | DW
The Human Factor, by Kim Vicente, humans & tech mismatching: LJ | DW
silverflight8: Barcode with silverflight8 on top and userid underneath (Barcode)
Earthquake happened, and it is so far out of my experience that I thought it might be people on the roof, doing construction. Or something. I just never expected to be in the midst of one, and so it was so very weird.

Haven't anything else to say, except that I'm still on track with writing (omg, \o/), and at 13,500 words.

I keep trying to read the book The Court of the Air (Stephen Hunt): it's a steampunk sci-fi, I suppose you could say, and I keep putting it down. This is because it reminds me frequently of my own book - the settings are entirely different, and the characters, too - but it has that first draft feel, and the dialogue is dead. The author dumps information on you. One of the main characters shows up in the first chapter and then is absent for the next half-dozen. It skips from what should be a horrifying act (someone just got killed in front of her, hello?) and goes to somewhere else entirely.

I find myself comparing it always to the books I've just read - in this case, The Ladies of Grace Adieu (by the incomparable Susanna Clarke, who wrote Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell) and Sherlock Holmes's last few chronicles. The distance between those two works and The Court of Air is enormous. In Clarke and Doyle's books you don't have the sound of the author's voice ringing in your head - Hunt's work feels as though I know what he's thinking as he writes it, adds a bit of dialogue-tag to round it off; in contrast, Clarke and Doyle's writing is confident, and it sounds like the narrator. Watson, as the narrator, sounds like a separate entity - even with the random intrusion of footnotes (I've got an annotated copy), it is always Watson speaking, not Doyle. I want to like it, and I like the premise very much; I can't get past the prose.

(This is sort of like reading Star Wars: Shatterpoint (Matthew Stover, he of the admired Episode III: Revenge of the Sith book adaptation; I deeply admire his ability to use new lines and punch you with the formatting of his prose), and something like Terry Brook's Episode I adaptation, which, frankly, was pretty much the movie narrated in a flat voice with a few extra scenes. (I read it, and if it hadn't when I was a week without internet and the first day I got books, it would not have been read.) The first one has vitality and movement (Shatterpoint evokes the Vietnam War, from what I understand of the conflict, very strongly). The second is just a retelling, and the movie, as much as it was criticized, was probably better.

*

So deeply behind on reviews I cannot even say. And I owe denise a thousand apologies because I still haven't finished those FAQ-revisions - they're almost done, and they keep getting pushed off *blushes really badly*
silverflight8: bee on rose  (Nanowrimo 2010)
It is nice to be reminded of the fact "Earth possesses a great deal of liquid water" - sometimes. Can't complain, since I don't live anywhere that has monsoon season. So many worms. But the wild-rose is blooming (finally) and the grass that is unmowed - i.e. the city green-spaces - is absolutely ridiculous and is waist-height.

Here, have a video )

I've read three books within the last three days (one of them reminded me why I really don't like Robespierre! Hi, French Revolution!) and I'm wondering if I ought to finish off the godforsaken Atlas Shrugged, which I began perhaps six months ago and abandoned. I also have the most amazing backlog of books to review, because I always put it off and oops! There goes my resolve.
silverflight8: bee on rose  (Default)
I dislike Twilight for many reasons, the stalking-is-love not one of the least reasons.

HOWEVER (and yes, this merits capslock), JUST BECAUSE MEYER'S VAMPIRES ARE NOT EXACTLY LIKE BRAM STOKER'S VAMPIRES, DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE INVALID. CAN WE DITCH THE IDEA THAT A VAMPIRE MUST BE EXACTLY TO SUCH SPECIFICATIONS? THEY'RE MYTHICAL.

Too many of the reviews focus on sparkling (heaven forbid anything sparkle, it must be too girly) rather than the actual problems in Twilight.


tl;dr. a change from an established trope doesn't mean a book's bad. zomg, people

silverflight8: bee on rose  (Default)


In reply to this rant, since I think this is another rant that just happens to touch on the same subject.

To paraphrase what many have said already: No writer is obligated to write you your dream fanfic (although it would be lovely, they're not obligated.) Similarly, no reader is obligated to leave reviews. Writing a fic for someone is a Nice Thing to do. Most reviews (barring troll's flames) are also Nice Things to do.

And you know what? I don't mind the one word reviews. They're not "useless". Generally, they're more honest, anyway. I know that I often look over my own reviews and sometimes adjust wording to make sure it's not an abrasive litany of wrong things. A succint, short, one-word reviews generally consist of the feelings that the reader has upon finishing the fic; this is useful.

You just have to interpret it.

Even the reviews saying "update plz!" are saying something to you: "I like it, I want to see more of this, I think that this story works so well that I can't wait for the next installment," and so on.

Please look up "entitlement." And let me tell you, I was very strongly tempted to critique your rant. Still am.

Profile

silverflight8: bee on rose  (Default)
silver

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 4 5
678910 1112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 09:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios