Mar. 4th, 2010

silverflight8: bee on rose  (Default)
I hate the fact that when it comes to public debate, the argument turns nasty. As in the ubiquitous personal attacks.

I derive a great deal of enjoyment from reading editorial columns and those Letters to the Editor (and honestly, some of them are superficial it's laughable) but they attack the writer - the writer of the original column or letter, not their ideas.

Um. I'm pretty sure that the best way to convince people is to not say things like: "So-and-so is showing her age..." and proceed to tell the rant that the "40-somethings" were the only ones that had a problem with the Winter Olympics closing ceremony. I raised my eyebrows at this, since nothing that the original writer wrote had any reference to her age. Other letters often begin: "[name omitted] is obviously not a blah-blah-blah and is ignorant of this-and-that", starting off their salvo with a personal attack.

Dissect, refute, turn-inside-out-and-backwards their argument, but stop attacking the writer themselves. Or if you must, take it off of the public newspaper.

Profile

silverflight8: bee on rose  (Default)
silver

August 2025

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10 111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 20th, 2025 05:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios